Many social media users only post photos of themselves that they like, and stars do the same. They publish the coolest photos on their pages, and subscribers can’t even tell if they’re looking at an original photo or an edited one.
Bright Side decided to compare photos of stars we found on their social media accounts to ones taken by professional photographers at various events. We believe that these women all look amazing, and they don’t need any editing.
Well we all know that a photographer would NEVER intentionally take a bad shot😱 Plenty of photos taken with a different background, angle and lighting CAN change a picture dramatically. As far as the weight difference, so what? She was trying to present a good image. She is beautiful in every picture. You try needing to be perfect in public ALL THE TIME.
What photos do you like looking at more — ones where a person looks perfect or those that are more natural?
the last can't be real
to salma is about light and position - anyway she doent need any enhancement like the others - you can see the filters and photoshop!
I think that a lot of these the original picture that the photographer made without all the editing and plastic surgery effects Lol looks way better than the ones that were messed with and changed up by whoever changed them. The changed up version of the photos mostly resulted in looking old, sick and in terrible health, the made-up filters were not appealing visually at all to me and not sexy. There are people who live in my neighborhood of rural small NC that look better than the edited versions and they even look better upon first waking up out of bed in the mornings extra raggedy and hillbilly style than a couple of the ghostly celeb filters. A coffee filter to hide their face would have worked just as well and been more appealing
