She looks even better than her painting.
15 Famous People of the Past Whose Depictions Prove That Photoshop Existed, Even in the Nineteenth Century
Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.
At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.
Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)
Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)
Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)
Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)
Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)
Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)
Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)
Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)


The painting isn't doing her justice...
Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)
Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)
Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)
Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)
Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)
Bonus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)
What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.
Comments
Adding Vincent Van Gogh's painting is a mistake. Vincent Van Gogh didn't 'photoshop' his self portrait, it looks different because it is an artistic style. And the whole article is not okay, maximum paintings are just fine, only 1 or 2 of them had been 'photoshoped'.
I wouldn't call it "photoshop" but rather "I pay you money for the painting so you will make the way I want it" 😂
especially in the first one 👍
most of the paintings actually show the most distinct features of those people so everything is accurate
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain looks about 25 in paint but 57 in teal life. Better editing (Or completely different) than the selfies nowadays haha
I'm guessing these photos were done at a different stage of their lives than the paintings. Yes, while some are quite different, some are pretty on point!
It’s not always a fair comparison when the age of the two compared is so diverse. I really noticed this in Van Gogh portrait. The photo is one taken when he was in his late twenties whereas the self portrait was done when he was 36.
Queen Victoria was a shocker.
Most of them look like well done paintings. Of course you'd look your best on portrait day - whether it's for a painting or an old timed photograph.

Related Reads
How 15 Actresses With Unusual Appearances Would Look If They Followed Modern Beauty Trends

Take a Peek at What Our Ancestors Really Looked Like (Some of the Images May Leave You Speechless)

10 Beauty Standards Women Don’t Care About Anymore

20 Perfect Coincidences That You Couldn’t Make Up If You Tried

12 Life Stories From Women With a Great Sense of Humor

My In-Laws Didn’t Invite Me to Dinner for a Humiliating Reason

Bright Side Readers Shared What Things Proved Their Parents’ Endless Love to Them

7 Riddles Only People With Good Gumption Can Solve

21 Stories About Job Interviews Nobody Was Ready For

14 People Shared the Turns Their Life Took After They Adopted a Kid

I'm Forced to Choose Between My Daughter and My Stepson

Pregnant Women Reveal 14 Insane Things People Actually Said to Them
