Oh dear!
15 Famous People of the Past Whose Depictions Prove That Photoshop Existed, Even in the Nineteenth Century

Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.
At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.
Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)
Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)

She looks even better than her painting.
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)
Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)
Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)
Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)
Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)
Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)
Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)

Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)
Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)
Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)
Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)
Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)
Bonus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)
What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.
Comments
Adding Vincent Van Gogh's painting is a mistake. Vincent Van Gogh didn't 'photoshop' his self portrait, it looks different because it is an artistic style. And the whole article is not okay, maximum paintings are just fine, only 1 or 2 of them had been 'photoshoped'.
I'm guessing these photos were done at a different stage of their lives than the paintings. Yes, while some are quite different, some are pretty on point!
It’s not always a fair comparison when the age of the two compared is so diverse. I really noticed this in Van Gogh portrait. The photo is one taken when he was in his late twenties whereas the self portrait was done when he was 36.
Queen Victoria was a shocker.
Most of them look like well done paintings. Of course you'd look your best on portrait day - whether it's for a painting or an old timed photograph.
Related Reads
How 15 Actresses With Unusual Appearances Would Look If They Followed Modern Beauty Trends

Take a Peek at What Our Ancestors Really Looked Like (Some of the Images May Leave You Speechless)

Angelina Jolie’s Latest Appearance Worries People: «She Looks Strange»

I Refuse to Help My Stepson—It’s Time He Learns My Kindness Had a Price

11 Moments That Prove the Best Parenting Is Quiet Love in Disguise

15+ Marriage Moments That Quietly Turned Into the Best Sitcom Nobody Could Script

13 Work Stories That Prove Real Life Beats Any Sitcom Script

12 Quiet Moments That Teach Us Kindness and Compassion Are the World’s Strongest Superpowers

15 Stories That Show Quiet Mercy Is Always the Loudest Kind of Love

10 Moments That Teach Us Kindness Can Change Everything, Even When Someone Was Ready to Give Up

10 Moments That Prove Quiet Kindness Is Noticed Even When No One Seems to Be Watching

15 Moments That Prove Kindness and Empathy Hold the World Together, Even When People Refuse to Listen to Each Other Anymore














