What 15 Celebrities Would Look Like If Their Face Fit the Golden Ratio

People
3 years ago

The way we perceive physical beauty is closely related to the Golden ratio, some researchers suggest. We decided to check and see if this is really true and test how the faces of our favorite celebrities would change if they were “perfect,” according to this theory.

We at Bright Side respect the individuality of each person, so we’ll let you pick between the “golden ratio” face and the natural one.

1. Angelina Jolie

2. Ariana Grande

3. Rihanna

4. Sarah Jessica Parker

5. Timothée Chalamet

6. Emilia Clarke

7. Gal Gadot

8. Brad Pitt

9. Sophie Turner

10. Hugh Jackman

11. Zendaya

12. Tyra Banks

13. Keanu Reeves

14. Meghan Markle

15. Margot Robbie

Do you prefer scientific perfection or individual imperfection? Would you like to change something about your appearance?

Preview photo credit badgalriri / instagram

Comments

Get notifications
3 years ago
Hidden for the greater good.

oh well, I guess the main beauty means not to be "perfect" as science describes.

1
-
Reply

There's something wrong with the "golden ratio" because almost all of them on the "ideal" side looks like their eyebrows are too far apart so that can't be ideal and it's most of them which would suggest the formula is wrong. But then again a perfect and Holy God created us so as we can see He made us as perfect as He could in an imperfect world

2
-
Reply

He/she completely messed this project up. The golden ratio works fantastically. Their ideal looks like a Salvador Dalí painting and is nothing like what the golden ratio mask looks like.

1
-
Reply
year ago
OMG Karen, why have you deleted this comment?

If you gonna apply the golden ratio, do it the right way. If you know how to draw the „ ideal“ human Head after loomis you know it follows the rules of the golden Ratio. Whoever did these does simply not understand the rules. It’s laughable.

2
-
Reply

You made many of them asymmetric - like Gal Gadot! You completely misused the golden ratio mask. It's like a 5 year old on their first attempt. This is a complete farce. The actual golden ratio holds very very well. This is an embarrassment.

3
1
Reply
year ago
This comment was eaten by a raccoon.

Ezt csak egy rosszul megírt program generálta, tele hibákkal. A valódi aranymetszés szerint mindenkinek szebb lenne az arca. A szépség ugyanakkor nem egyenlő a vonzóval. A teltebb ajkak, nagyobb szemek, már az ezüstmetszéshez igazodnak, ami dögössé teszi őket.
Az aranymetszést kb 5 ezer éve, az ezüstarányt közel 4 ezer éve ismeri a tudomány. 3 évvel ezelőtt egy eredeti mértani megoldást alkottam meg az aranymetszésre, 1 évvel később az ezüstarányra is, melyek segítségével elsőként vált lehetővé egy magyar módszerrel a két legszebb mértani arány szabad szemmértékkel történő milliméter pontos alkalmazása.
Azóta már 56 országból több mint 13 ezer diák tanult az akadémiánkon, köztük nemzetközileg elismert festőművészek és egyetemi művésztanárok.
Jelenleg éppen New Yorkban tanítok.
Ha szeretnétek róla többet is megtudni, látogassatok el a weboldalunkra:
www.huszarmodszer.hu

-
-
Reply

YOUR PHI MEASUREMENTS ARE ALL WRONG. WHY HAVE YOU DONE THAT? TRY AGAIN YOU ARE MISLEADING YOUR READERS OTHERWISE.

-
-
Reply

Tyra Banks is a perfect example of a misproportioned face in real life. Her nose is too small. Your "real" photos don't reflect this either???>

-
-
Reply

Nope! Nope! Nope! Nope! Rihanna and Emilia Clark are the only ones improved by the changes and maybe Meghan Markle. Gal Gadot especially changed for the worse.

1
-
Reply

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddddddddddddddddd heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllllllllllllllllllllllllllppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

-
-
Reply

Related Reads