Oh dear!
15 Famous People of the Past Whose Depictions Prove That Photoshop Existed, Even in the Nineteenth Century
Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.
At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.
Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)
Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)


She looks even better than her painting.
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)
Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)
Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)
Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)
Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)
Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)
Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)

Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)
Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)
Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)
Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)
Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)
Bonus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)
What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.
Comments
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain looks about 25 in paint but 57 in teal life. Better editing (Or completely different) than the selfies nowadays haha
I'm guessing these photos were done at a different stage of their lives than the paintings. Yes, while some are quite different, some are pretty on point!
It’s not always a fair comparison when the age of the two compared is so diverse. I really noticed this in Van Gogh portrait. The photo is one taken when he was in his late twenties whereas the self portrait was done when he was 36.
Queen Victoria was a shocker.
Most of them look like well done paintings. Of course you'd look your best on portrait day - whether it's for a painting or an old timed photograph.

Related Reads
18 Women That Took Part in Transformation Shows and Became Completely New People

10 Beauty Standards Women Don’t Care About Anymore

“Too Bad She Couldn’t Accept Aging Gracefully,” Shania Twain, 58, Looks Shockingly Youthful in New Pic

12 Nannies Who Could Write a Bestseller With Their Adventures

12 Witty Comebacks That Were So Sharp, They Silenced the Room

I Bought My Grandson New Clothes—My DIL Humiliated Me

I Regret Letting My Mom Help—It Destroyed Our Relationship

My MIL Embarrassed My Son but Karma Had My Back

My Daughter Tricked Me Into Babysitting—So I Served a Payback She Won’t Forget

10 Bold Comebacks That Turned the Tables Instantly

I Refused to Let My Food Be Stolen at Work, But I Think I Crossed a Line

My Stepkids’ Mom Said I Had No Right to Call Them ‘My Kids’—But I Set Her Straight
